Real-World Effectiveness of Anti-IL-5/5R Therapy in Severe Atopic Eosinophilic Asthma with Fungal Sensitization.

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma with fungal sensitization (SAFS) is a complex clinical phenotype associated with poorly controlled type 2 inflammation and significant morbidity from both the disease itself and a high steroid burden. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of biologic therapies targeting eosinophilic inflammation in SAFS. METHODS: We assessed the effectiveness of treatment with mepolizumab or benralizumab in patients with SAFS, and compared outcomes with patients with severe atopic asthma without fungal sensitization and patients with severe nonatopic asthma. Baseline clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes at 48 weeks were evaluated. A subgroup analysis was performed of patients who met the criteria for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) rather than SAFS. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients treated with mepolizumab (n = 63) or benralizumab (n = 130) were included. Patients with SAFS had higher baseline IgE level compared with patients with severe atopic asthma without fungal sensitization and severe nonatopic asthma (733 ± 837 IU/mL vs 338 ± 494 and 142 ± 171, respectively; both P < .001). There were no other significant baseline differences in clinical characteristics between groups. At 48 weeks, there were significant improvements in 6-item asthma control questionnaire score and exacerbation frequency, and reduction in maintenance oral corticosteroid dose across all groups (all P < .05). No significant between-group differences in outcomes were observed at 48 weeks. Patients with ABPA (n = 9) had a significant reduction in exacerbation frequency (P = .013) with treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with eosinophil-targeting biologics led to improvements in exacerbation frequency, oral corticosteroid requirements, and patient-reported outcomes in patients with SAFS, with a reduction in exacerbations in the subgroup of patients with ABPA. These data highlight the potential clinical utility of targeting eosinophilic inflammation in SAFS and ABPA.

A pragmatic guide to choosing biologic therapies in severe asthma.

There are now several monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies ("biologics") available to treat severe asthma. Omalizumab is an anti-IgE mAb and is licensed in severe allergic asthma. Current evidence suggests it may decrease exacerbations by augmenting deficient antiviral immune responses in asthma. Like all other biologics, clinical efficacy is greatest in those with elevated T2 biomarkers. Three biologics target the interleukin (IL)-5-eosinophil pathway, including mepolizumab and reslizumab that target IL-5 itself, and benralizumab that targets the IL-5 receptor (IL-5R-α). These drugs all reduce the exacerbation rate in those with raised blood eosinophil counts. Mepolizumab and benralizumab have also demonstrated steroid-sparing efficacy. Reslizumab is the only biologic that is given intravenously rather than by the subcutaneous route. Dupilumab targets the IL-4 receptor and like mepolizumab and benralizumab is effective at reducing exacerbation rate as well as oral corticosteroid requirements. It is also effective for the treatment of nasal polyposis and atopic dermatitis. Tezepelumab is an anti-TSLP (thymic stromal lymphopoietin) mAb that has recently completed phase 3 trials demonstrating significant reductions in exacerbation rate even at lower T2 biomarker thresholds. Many patients with severe asthma qualify for more than one biologic. To date, there are no head-to-head trials to aid physicians in this choice. However, post-hoc analyses have identified certain clinical characteristics that are associated with superior responses to some therapies. The presence of allergic and/or eosinophilic comorbidities, such as atopic dermatitis, nasal polyposis or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, that may additionally benefit by the choice of biologic should also be taken into consideration, as should patient preferences which may include dosing frequency. To date, all biologics have been shown to have excellent safety profiles.

Real-World Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Benralizumab is an IL5-receptor monoclonal antibody licensed for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). It has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials in reducing asthma exacerbation rates and maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCSs). RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the real-world effectiveness of benralizumab and what baseline characteristics are associated with response to therapy? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We assessed outcomes in all SEA patients who began benralizumab treatment at our specialist center. At each dosing visit, exacerbation history, mOCS dose, spirometry, and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ6) and Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (mAQLQ) scores were recorded. Response to treatment was defined as a reduction of ≥ 50% in annualized exacerbation rate (AER) or in mOCS dose after 48 weeks of treatment. Super response was defined as zero exacerbations and no mOCSs for asthma. RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients were included in the analysis. At 48 weeks, a 72.8% reduction in AER was noted, from 4.92 ± 3.35 per year in the year preceding biologic treatment to 1.34 ± 1.71 per year (P < .001), including 57 patients (43.8%) who were exacerbation-free with benralizumab. In those receiving mOCSs (n = 74 [56.9%]), the median daily prednisolone dose fell from 10 mg (interquartile range, 5-20 mg) to 0 mg (interquartile range, 0-5 mg; P < .001), and 38 of 74 patients (51.4%) were able to discontinue mOCS therapy. Clinically and statistically significant improvements were found in ACQ6 scores, mAQLQ scores, and FEV1. Overall, 51 patients (39%) met the super responder definition and 112 patients (86%) met the responder definition. The optimal regression model of super responders vs other responders included baseline characteristics associated with a strongly eosinophilic phenotype and less severe disease. Eighteen patients (13.8%) were nonresponders to benralizumab. Evidence of chronic airway infection was observed in 6 of 18 patients, and an increase in the blood eosinophil count consistent with the development of anti-drug antibodies was observed in 5 of 18 patients. INTERPRETATION: In a large real-world SEA cohort, benralizumab led to significant improvements in all clinical outcome measures. A lack of response was seen in a minority of patients and should be a focus for future investigation.

Real-World Effectiveness and the Characteristics of a "Super-Responder" to Mepolizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Mepolizumab was the first licensed anti-IL5 monoclonal antibody for severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). To date there are few data to confirm its efficacy in the real-world setting or assessment of baseline characteristics associated with response. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do patients with severe eosinophilic asthma respond to mepolizumab in the real world setting and which characteristics are associated with a super-response to this therapy? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who received at least 16 weeks of treatment with mepolizumab (100 mg subcutaneously) for SEA at our regional asthma center in the United Kingdom. Clinical data were collected at each 4-week visit. At 16, 24, and 52 weeks, patients were classified as "responders" or "nonresponders." A response was defined as ≥50% reduction in exacerbations; for patients whose condition requires maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS), a response was defined as ≥50% reduction in prednisolone dose. Super responders were defined as exacerbation-free and off mOCS at one year. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included in the analysis. Asthma exacerbations decreased from a baseline of 4.04 ± 2.57 to 1.86 ± 2.17 per year at one year (54% reduction; P < .001). Sixty-eight patients were receiving mOCS at the time of commencing mepolizumab. By one year, the daily median dose fell from 10 mg (interquartile range, 10 to 15) to 0 mg (interquartile range, 0 to 10; P < .001). Fifty-seven percent of them were able to discontinue mOCS; 72.7% (95% CI, 63.0 to 80.7) of the patients were classified as responders, and 28.3% (95% CI, 20.2 to 38.0) of the patients were classified as super responders. Baseline characteristics associated with responder and super responder status included the presence of nasal polyposis (P = .012), lower baseline Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (P = .006), a lower BMI (P = .014), and, in those patients receiving mOCS, a significantly lower prednisolone dose at baseline (P = .005). At 16 weeks, the one-year responder status was correctly identified in 80.8% patients; by 24 weeks, this status rose to 92.9%. INTERPRETATION: In a real-world SEA cohort, treatment with mepolizumab reduced exacerbation frequency and mOCS requirements. Nasal polyposis, a lower BMI, and a lower maintenance prednisolone requirement at baseline were associated with better outcomes. Twelve-month response was identifiable in >90% of patients by week 24.

Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease Associated Cough: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cough in interstitial lung disease (ILD) causes significant impairment in quality of life. Effective treatment approaches are needed for cough associated with ILD. METHODS: This systematic review asked: Is there evidence of clinically relevant treatment effects for therapies for cough in ILD? Studies of adults aged > 18 years with a chronic cough ≥ 8 weeks' duration were included and assessed for relevance and quality. Based on the systematic review, guideline suggestions were developed and voted on by using CHEST guideline methodology. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials and two case series (≥ 10 patients) were included that reported data on patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, and scleroderma-related ILD who received a variety of interventions. Study quality was high in all eight randomized controlled trials. Inhaled corticosteroids were not supported for cough associated with sarcoidosis. Cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate were not supported for solely treating cough associated with scleroderma-associated ILD. A recommendation for thalidomide to treat cough associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis did not pass the panel vote. In view of the paucity of antitussive treatment options for refractory cough in ILD, the guideline panel suggested that the CHEST unexplained chronic cough guideline be followed by considering options such as the neuromodulator gabapentin and speech pathology management. Opiates were also suggested for patients with cough refractory to alternative therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supporting the management of chronic cough in ILD is limited. This guideline presents suggestions for managing and treating cough on the best available evidence, but future research is clearly needed.